His judgment is based on insufficient quantity. When the turnover of 2W billion was maintained in November, A shares barely rebounded by 3500 once. At present, the turnover has been kept below 2W billion, so 3400 points is the top.According to Liu Changsong's point of view, to put it bluntly, shrinkage will fall. Then, according to this logic, because everyone is buying up and not buying down, they will continue to shrink when they fall, so they will continue to fall. Then how to explain the sudden surge in volume at the end of September? How to explain the continuous decline after the release of the sky on October 8? In fact, people who see the heavy volume re-enter the market are now in the position of 10.8.And I don't want to bet on the confidence of the organization, but I don't want to be short, so I have switched my position from individual stocks to a sound debt base.
Among the national debt and political debt, I chose the only political bond ETF in the two cities. Although the debt base is very safe and the risk is very small, the latter has a short duration compared with 30 years, and the short-term withdrawal is even smaller due to the negative impact. In addition, the government debt itself is also a "quasi-national debt", because of the credit risk compensation, it has a higher yield and a higher cost performance than the national debt.Moreover, the liquidity is very good. The daily turnover is 7 billion, which is still T+0. There is no stamp duty. You can withdraw at any time to copy stocks, and you can hide in it to eat solid income. This year, it has also increased by 7%.His judgment is based on insufficient quantity. When the turnover of 2W billion was maintained in November, A shares barely rebounded by 3500 once. At present, the turnover has been kept below 2W billion, so 3400 points is the top.
Last Friday, A shares successfully stood at 3,400 points. At the weekend, Liu Changsong, the big V, said: 3,418 points is the top area in December, but this year it has risen by 3,500 points.And I don't want to bet on the confidence of the organization, but I don't want to be short, so I have switched my position from individual stocks to a sound debt base.Among the national debt and political debt, I chose the only political bond ETF in the two cities. Although the debt base is very safe and the risk is very small, the latter has a short duration compared with 30 years, and the short-term withdrawal is even smaller due to the negative impact. In addition, the government debt itself is also a "quasi-national debt", because of the credit risk compensation, it has a higher yield and a higher cost performance than the national debt.